Updates to SORA
On February 14, 2020, Judge Cleland issued an opinion & order on the Does v. Snyder II litigation which ruled in our favor on all counts. This was a landmark ruling for the Sex Offender Registry Act (SORA) in Michigan, as Judge Cleland deemed SORA to be unconstitutional as it currently written.
The ruling established that SORA is in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution, which prohibits the government from retroactively expanding the punishment for a crime which has already been committed. For example, if someone was convicted of a crime in the year 2000 and was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but the punishment for that crime was amended in 2005 to require a minimum of 15 years in prison, it would be unconstitutional for prosecutors to extend that person’s prison time since they have already been sentenced. The practices of the Michigan State Legislature and Michigan prosecutors with respect to SORA have mirrored that example.
In 2006 and 2011, the Michigan State Legislature passed amendments to SORA which enabled prosecutors to retroactively reclassify individuals convicted of sex-related crimes. This typically resulted in tier 1 and tier 2 registrants being reclassified to tier 3 and, in some cases, individuals who were not required to be on the registry at all being forced to register for life. Consequently, despite not committing additional crimes, people who were only supposed to serve 0-25 years on the registry were then forced to register for life. Judge Cleland’s order confirms this to be a constitutional violation and requires the Michigan State Legislature to rectify SORA in that regard.
Below are links to some of the important documents filed in the case. Most importantly is the Final Judgment, dated August 4, 2021 that once and for all provides for relief from the unconstitutional aspects of the subject SORA laws. To find out more about how this judgment affects your particular case, please give us an opportunity to review your individual case and see what paths may be available for further relief.
We understand how harmful these laws have been to the lives of the people it has afflicted. If you have been affected by these unconstitutional practices, please complete this submission form to the best of your ability. Once the new law is passed, our team of experienced attorneys will review your individual circumstances and determine if there are further legal options for us to pursue on your behalf, including the recovery of financial damages. Oliver Law Group P.C. will never share your information with any third-party and will only use the information you provide to review your potential case.
How We Can Help
Because inclusion on the sex offender registry list subjects registrants to a life of hurdles and harsh judgement—they often have trouble finding work, housing, and partnership—we believe in helping registrants find justice to make up for these transgressions.
Oliver Law Group, P.C. is the only private law firm in Michigan appointed as class counsel with the ACLU and the University of Michigan during the fight to change the Sex Offender Registry Act. We have been on the forefront of this issue since SORA was originally ruled unconstitutional in 2016 and we are the only local law firm that fought to change the law—and succeeded. By working with us, you can be confident that you have an attorney on your side who has been fighting for you for years.
To work with an attorney who has a history fighting the rights of registered sex offenders for years, contact us.